Discussion:
Apple to start using Intel processors ?
(too old to reply)
2005-05-23 15:19:32 UTC
Permalink
Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/public/us

Apple Explores Use Of Chips From Intel For Macintosh Line

By DON CLARK and NICK WINGFIELD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
May 23, 2005; Page C1

Apple Computer Inc. has always blazed its own trail, a tack that has helped
turn the company into a stock-market darling lately. But a pivotal step
toward the mainstream could be in the offing.

The computer maker has been in talks that could lead to a decision soon to
use Intel Corp. chips in its Macintosh computer line, industry executives
say, a prospect that may shake up the world of computers and software.

The idea that Apple Computer might use Intel-based products, which provide
processing power for personal computers that use Microsoft Corp. software,
has long been the subject of industry speculation and off-and-on
negotiations between Apple and Intel. Two industry executives with knowledge
of recent discussions between the companies said Apple will agree to use
Intel chips.

Neither company would confirm any change in their relationship. Nor is it
clear, if Apple does proceed with plans to work with Intel, whether it will
make a large-scale shift away from chips made by International Business
Machines Corp., its longtime supplier. Talks between Apple and Intel could
founder, as they have before, or Apple could be engaging in negotiations
with Intel to gain leverage over IBM.

Still, Apple's consideration of Intel chips reflects what others in Silicon
Valley see as a crescendo of commercial considerations for both companies.
For Apple, which has struggled to expand beyond a tiny sliver of the PC
market, adopting Intel chips would help ensure that future Macintosh systems
meet the price and performance of products from tough rivals such as Dell
Inc.

Macintosh users, for example, could benefit by getting access to Intel's
power-saving chips for laptop computers and other new chips that offer the
equivalent of two electronic brains on a single piece of silicon. Apple's
pricing, which has often been higher than rivals, also could be more
competitive -- particularly if Intel provides the kind of marketing
subsidies it has given to other computer makers.

Using Intel chips also makes it at least theoretically possible that users
could install Windows on Macintosh systems, though it is not clear that
Apple will support software other than its Mac OS X operating system.

For Intel, already the dominant supplier of the calculating engines inside
computers, winning Apple would be a prestigious endorsement from one of
technology's most influential trend-setters. Under Steve Jobs, Apple's chief
executive officer and co-founder, Apple has consistently delivered
innovative hardware designs and blazed a trail in digital music.

Apple sells only about three million computers a year -- a small portion of
the 200 million or so machines sold globally -- so a new relationship with
Intel wouldn't increase that company's sales much. But Intel, which has long
courted Apple, could benefit by an association with Apple and its hit iPod
device, which may be luring more Windows PC users to consider Apple computer
products. It could also continue the perception of momentum that has made
Apple shares nearly quadruple since the iPod was introduced in October
2001...

...An Apple spokeswoman said she would characterize the possibility of
adopting Intel chips "in the category of rumor and speculation."

Apple could choose to add some Intel-based models to its product line or
make a complete shift to Intel's chip technology. The latter would be a
serious blow to IBM's microprocessor business, though the big computer maker
has had success in convincing Microsoft, Sony Corp. and Nintendo Co. to use
PowerPC technology in their next-generation video machines. An IBM spokesman
declined to comment...

Apple's bread-and-butter Mac business has shown signs of vigor lately. While
growth in the broader PC industry remains sluggish, Apple last quarter sold
43% more Macs than it did in the year-earlier quarter, quadruple the pace of
the industry as a whole.

Yet, in a sign of how small a player Apple remains in the PC market, the
strong sales have translated into only minuscule market-share gains. Apple
rose to 2.3% of new world-wide PC sales in the first three months of the
year from 2% the prior quarter. Windows PCs account for the vast majority of
the rest of the market.
ZnU
2005-05-23 15:42:41 UTC
Permalink
Post by
Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/public/us
Apple Explores Use Of Chips From Intel For Macintosh Line
By DON CLARK and NICK WINGFIELD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
May 23, 2005; Page C1
Apple Computer Inc. has always blazed its own trail, a tack that has helped
turn the company into a stock-market darling lately. But a pivotal step
toward the mainstream could be in the offing.
The computer maker has been in talks that could lead to a decision soon to
use Intel Corp. chips in its Macintosh computer line, industry executives
say, a prospect that may shake up the world of computers and software.
Looking at what Intel and IBM have in the pipe, the idea that Apple
would switch to Intel processors for its computer line is blatantly
absurd. It might have made sense in the dark days of Motorola
stagnation; it makes no sense at all now. In case anyone hasn't noticed,
the movement these days is in the opposite direction -- Microsoft has
picked PPC for its new Xbox.

Moreover, it's unlikely Apple could make the switch even if they wanted
to. Emulating the PPC is notoriously difficult, and any new system which
couldn't run old software without a recompile would surely be a flop;
there would be no way to orchestrate a smooth transition, and lots of
apps would probably just never make it across at all.

Assuming Apple and Intel are actually in talks, there are a lot of
possibilities much more likely than Apple adopting Intel chips for the
Mac. Apple could be looking for a chip for a media appliance or wireless
device or some other embedded application, for instance. Maybe they want
to use Intel's XScale processors in a new video iPod or something.
(These processors are based on the ARM architecture, which Apple used in
some Newton models.)

[snip]
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply
ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."
-- George W. Bush in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005
l'indien
2005-05-23 21:26:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by ZnU
Post by
Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/public/us
Apple Explores Use Of Chips From Intel For Macintosh Line
By DON CLARK and NICK WINGFIELD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
May 23, 2005; Page C1
Apple Computer Inc. has always blazed its own trail, a tack that has helped
turn the company into a stock-market darling lately. But a pivotal step
toward the mainstream could be in the offing.
The computer maker has been in talks that could lead to a decision soon to
use Intel Corp. chips in its Macintosh computer line, industry executives
say, a prospect that may shake up the world of computers and software.
[...]
Post by ZnU
Moreover, it's unlikely Apple could make the switch even if they wanted
to. Emulating the PPC is notoriously difficult, and any new system which
couldn't run old software without a recompile would surely be a flop;
there would be no way to orchestrate a smooth transition, and lots of
apps would probably just never make it across at all.
I don't think that Apple is going to switch to Intel CPU (or if Intel
starts producing PowerPC products ;-) ) but you're wrong saying PowerPC
emulation is so difficult. PowerPC is based on the RISC concept. Even if
it has a lot of instructions, a versatile and elaborated MMU model, ...,
it's far more simple to emulate than x86 or the venerable 68k. And
remember that Apple did have a full 68k emulation in MacOS, some years ago...
Then, if they'd like to do this switch, they could technically do. But if
they become some kind of PC assembler, they're gonna die and I think they
know this fact.
The only reason of Apple still being alive, imho, is that they don't do
the same products as all others PC makers.
[...]
Joe Seigh
2005-05-23 21:46:27 UTC
Permalink
As in OS X will run on generic non Apple computers? Is Apple planning
on getting out of the system hardware business?
--
Joe Seigh

When you get lemons, you make lemonade.
When you get hardware, you make software.
Rick Jones
2005-05-25 00:47:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by ZnU
Looking at what Intel and IBM have in the pipe, the idea that Apple
would switch to Intel processors for its computer line is blatantly
absurd.
Why would it have to be a switch?

rick jones
--
Process shall set you free from the need for rational thought.
these opinions are mine, all mine; HP might not want them anyway... :)
feel free to post, OR email to rick.jones2 in hp.com but NOT BOTH...
ZnU
2005-05-25 06:14:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick Jones
Post by ZnU
Looking at what Intel and IBM have in the pipe, the idea that Apple
would switch to Intel processors for its computer line is blatantly
absurd.
Why would it have to be a switch?
Taking the entire platform -- including third-party apps --
multi-architecture on a permanent basis is probably much more work than
it's worth.
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply
ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."
-- George W. Bush in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005
Judd
2005-05-25 04:34:45 UTC
Permalink
Notwithstanding, the dumbest post I've ever read. Look at what the console
market has done is somehow going to tell us what the PC market is going to
do? You, sir, are an imbecile! If they make the move, they could gain
CONSIDERABLE marketshare. I don't see Windows moving over to the Cell
processor nor one of their hybrid PPC processors. They tried that in the
past and failed miserably. The console game market has never embraced PC
processors until MS used PIII's for the X-Box. It isn't like suddenly the
console game market switched to non Intel chips.
Post by ZnU
Post by
Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/public/us
Apple Explores Use Of Chips From Intel For Macintosh Line
By DON CLARK and NICK WINGFIELD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
May 23, 2005; Page C1
Apple Computer Inc. has always blazed its own trail, a tack that has helped
turn the company into a stock-market darling lately. But a pivotal step
toward the mainstream could be in the offing.
The computer maker has been in talks that could lead to a decision soon to
use Intel Corp. chips in its Macintosh computer line, industry executives
say, a prospect that may shake up the world of computers and software.
Looking at what Intel and IBM have in the pipe, the idea that Apple
would switch to Intel processors for its computer line is blatantly
absurd. It might have made sense in the dark days of Motorola
stagnation; it makes no sense at all now. In case anyone hasn't noticed,
the movement these days is in the opposite direction -- Microsoft has
picked PPC for its new Xbox.
Moreover, it's unlikely Apple could make the switch even if they wanted
to. Emulating the PPC is notoriously difficult, and any new system which
couldn't run old software without a recompile would surely be a flop;
there would be no way to orchestrate a smooth transition, and lots of
apps would probably just never make it across at all.
Assuming Apple and Intel are actually in talks, there are a lot of
possibilities much more likely than Apple adopting Intel chips for the
Mac. Apple could be looking for a chip for a media appliance or wireless
device or some other embedded application, for instance. Maybe they want
to use Intel's XScale processors in a new video iPod or something.
(These processors are based on the ARM architecture, which Apple used in
some Newton models.)
[snip]
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply
ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."
-- George W. Bush in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005
ZnU
2005-05-25 06:12:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Judd
Notwithstanding, the dumbest post I've ever read. Look at what the console
market has done is somehow going to tell us what the PC market is going to
do? You, sir, are an imbecile! If they make the move, they could gain
CONSIDERABLE marketshare. I don't see Windows moving over to the Cell
processor nor one of their hybrid PPC processors. They tried that in the
past and failed miserably. The console game market has never embraced PC
processors until MS used PIII's for the X-Box. It isn't like suddenly the
console game market switched to non Intel chips.
Huh? Nobody is talking about Windows moving to PPC -- the need to
support all those existing x86 binaries doesn't make that a realistic
possibility. I'm talking about Apple *staying* with PPC. And yes, I
think the console market has a lot of relevance, particularly to Apple.
What are Apple's two major markets? Consumers and professional content
creation. The architectures being pursued by console vendors are almost
taylor made for addressing the performance concerns users in these
markets have.
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply
ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."
-- George W. Bush in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005
Judd
2005-05-26 05:05:16 UTC
Permalink
Post by ZnU
Post by Judd
Notwithstanding, the dumbest post I've ever read. Look at what the console
market has done is somehow going to tell us what the PC market is going to
do? You, sir, are an imbecile! If they make the move, they could gain
CONSIDERABLE marketshare. I don't see Windows moving over to the Cell
processor nor one of their hybrid PPC processors. They tried that in the
past and failed miserably. The console game market has never embraced PC
processors until MS used PIII's for the X-Box. It isn't like suddenly the
console game market switched to non Intel chips.
Huh? Nobody is talking about Windows moving to PPC -- the need to
support all those existing x86 binaries doesn't make that a realistic
possibility. I'm talking about Apple *staying* with PPC. And yes, I
think the console market has a lot of relevance, particularly to Apple.
What are Apple's two major markets? Consumers and professional content
creation. The architectures being pursued by console vendors are almost
taylor made for addressing the performance concerns users in these
markets have.
Consumers and prefessional content creation? Uh, OK, but that doesn't mean
that it makes sense to move to a Cell processor platform. Those users may
still feel more comfortable doing their content creation in a standard PC
environment if the support from Apple was there. Their sysadmins may want
it as well. Their companies which pay them may want it. All of this for
many reasons including $$$. Those other processors are bound to fail in the
consumer PC market. Apple could gain a lot by jumping ship now and getting
the platform stable by the time Intel ships the really good products in
2006. It's not just a microprocessor. It's a platform. The new built in
management tools, the support, the hardware, etc. all come into play.
ZnU
2005-05-26 07:10:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Judd
Post by ZnU
Post by Judd
Notwithstanding, the dumbest post I've ever read. Look at what
the console market has done is somehow going to tell us what the
PC market is going to do? You, sir, are an imbecile! If they
make the move, they could gain CONSIDERABLE marketshare. I don't
see Windows moving over to the Cell processor nor one of their
hybrid PPC processors. They tried that in the past and failed
miserably. The console game market has never embraced PC
processors until MS used PIII's for the X-Box. It isn't like
suddenly the console game market switched to non Intel chips.
Huh? Nobody is talking about Windows moving to PPC -- the need to
support all those existing x86 binaries doesn't make that a
realistic possibility. I'm talking about Apple *staying* with PPC.
And yes, I think the console market has a lot of relevance,
particularly to Apple. What are Apple's two major markets?
Consumers and professional content creation. The architectures
being pursued by console vendors are almost taylor made for
addressing the performance concerns users in these markets have.
Consumers and prefessional content creation? Uh, OK, but that doesn't mean
that it makes sense to move to a Cell processor platform. Those users may
still feel more comfortable doing their content creation in a standard PC
environment if the support from Apple was there. Their sysadmins may want
it as well. Their companies which pay them may want it.
Huh? I don't understand. The Cell doesn't lack any features that prevent
it from hosting a "standard PC environment." It's not all vector
processing, you know -- it has a general-purpose core faster than most
CPUs currently on the market. It's more than capable of handling all the
day-to-day tasks of desktop computing -- which as I've pointed out
aren't all that taxing for modern hardware.
Post by Judd
All of this for many reasons including $$$. Those other processors
are bound to fail in the consumer PC market. Apple could gain a lot
by jumping ship now and getting the platform stable by the time Intel
ships the really good products in 2006. It's not just a
microprocessor. It's a platform. The new built in management tools,
the support, the hardware, etc. all come into play.
And PPC is turning into much more than just a processor as well. There
are a lot of people using it, and IBM is promoting it very aggressively
-- look at the Cell-related announcements yesterday. IBM also seems more
willing than Intel to work with its major customers on customized
versions of the chip.

Why would Apple move from to x86 when everyone else (who has a choice)
is picking PPC these days?
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply
ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."
-- George W. Bush in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005
ZnU
2005-05-27 04:43:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by ZnU
Post by Judd
Post by ZnU
Post by Judd
Notwithstanding, the dumbest post I've ever read. Look at what
the console market has done is somehow going to tell us what the
PC market is going to do? You, sir, are an imbecile! If they
make the move, they could gain CONSIDERABLE marketshare. I don't
see Windows moving over to the Cell processor nor one of their
hybrid PPC processors. They tried that in the past and failed
miserably. The console game market has never embraced PC
processors until MS used PIII's for the X-Box. It isn't like
suddenly the console game market switched to non Intel chips.
Huh? Nobody is talking about Windows moving to PPC -- the need to
support all those existing x86 binaries doesn't make that a
realistic possibility. I'm talking about Apple *staying* with PPC.
And yes, I think the console market has a lot of relevance,
particularly to Apple. What are Apple's two major markets?
Consumers and professional content creation. The architectures
being pursued by console vendors are almost taylor made for
addressing the performance concerns users in these markets have.
Consumers and prefessional content creation? Uh, OK, but that doesn't mean
that it makes sense to move to a Cell processor platform. Those users may
still feel more comfortable doing their content creation in a standard PC
environment if the support from Apple was there. Their sysadmins may want
it as well. Their companies which pay them may want it.
Huh? I don't understand. The Cell doesn't lack any features that prevent
it from hosting a "standard PC environment." It's not all vector
processing, you know -- it has a general-purpose core faster than most
CPUs currently on the market. It's more than capable of handling all the
day-to-day tasks of desktop computing -- which as I've pointed out
aren't all that taxing for modern hardware.
Another Cell-related announcement:

http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20050525/105050/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Corp. has revealed a prototype blade server board featuring the Cell
microprocessor jointly developed with the Sony Group and Toshiba Corp.
The company demonstrated the prototype in front of only a few clients at
a hotel room outside Los Angeles, US, at the 2005 Electronic
Entertainment Expo (E3), game tradeshow. "We demonstrated the prototype
to show that Cell continues to mature. The product is expected to have
several times higher performance compared to conventional servers," said
an IBM engineer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

It sure looks like Cell is going to have applications outside of game
consoles.
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply
ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."
-- George W. Bush in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005
Judd
2005-05-27 05:40:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by ZnU
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20050525/105050/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Corp. has revealed a prototype blade server board featuring the Cell
microprocessor jointly developed with the Sony Group and Toshiba Corp.
The company demonstrated the prototype in front of only a few clients at
a hotel room outside Los Angeles, US, at the 2005 Electronic
Entertainment Expo (E3), game tradeshow. "We demonstrated the prototype
to show that Cell continues to mature. The product is expected to have
several times higher performance compared to conventional servers," said
an IBM engineer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It sure looks like Cell is going to have applications outside of game
consoles.
Gosh, if it keeps up the good work, it will a replacement for the Itanium.
TravelinMan
2005-05-27 13:46:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Judd
Post by ZnU
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20050525/105050/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Corp. has revealed a prototype blade server board featuring the Cell
microprocessor jointly developed with the Sony Group and Toshiba Corp.
The company demonstrated the prototype in front of only a few clients at
a hotel room outside Los Angeles, US, at the 2005 Electronic
Entertainment Expo (E3), game tradeshow. "We demonstrated the prototype
to show that Cell continues to mature. The product is expected to have
several times higher performance compared to conventional servers," said
an IBM engineer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It sure looks like Cell is going to have applications outside of game
consoles.
Gosh, if it keeps up the good work, it will a replacement for the Itanium.
If they multiply the price by 10, slow it down, and multiply the power
consumption by 5, you'll be right.
Judd
2005-06-07 04:31:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by ZnU
Post by Judd
Post by ZnU
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20050525/105050/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by Judd
Post by ZnU
IBM Corp. has revealed a prototype blade server board featuring the Cell
microprocessor jointly developed with the Sony Group and Toshiba Corp.
The company demonstrated the prototype in front of only a few clients at
a hotel room outside Los Angeles, US, at the 2005 Electronic
Entertainment Expo (E3), game tradeshow. "We demonstrated the prototype
to show that Cell continues to mature. The product is expected to have
several times higher performance compared to conventional servers," said
an IBM engineer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Post by Judd
Post by ZnU
It sure looks like Cell is going to have applications outside of game
consoles.
Gosh, if it keeps up the good work, it will a replacement for the Itanium.
If they multiply the price by 10, slow it down, and multiply the power
consumption by 5, you'll be right.
Yeah, it's soooo fast and boy that power consumption. We all know how good
IBM as with power consumption. Just ask Apple... who, by the way, IS making
the move.
Mr Bosrino
2005-08-14 20:54:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by ZnU
Post by ZnU
Post by Judd
Post by ZnU
Post by Judd
Notwithstanding, the dumbest post I've ever read. Look at what
the console market has done is somehow going to tell us what the
PC market is going to do? You, sir, are an imbecile! If they
make the move, they could gain CONSIDERABLE marketshare. I don't
see Windows moving over to the Cell processor nor one of their
hybrid PPC processors. They tried that in the past and failed
miserably. The console game market has never embraced PC
processors until MS used PIII's for the X-Box. It isn't like
suddenly the console game market switched to non Intel chips.
Huh? Nobody is talking about Windows moving to PPC -- the need to
support all those existing x86 binaries doesn't make that a
realistic possibility. I'm talking about Apple *staying* with PPC.
And yes, I think the console market has a lot of relevance,
particularly to Apple. What are Apple's two major markets?
Consumers and professional content creation. The architectures
being pursued by console vendors are almost taylor made for
addressing the performance concerns users in these markets have.
Consumers and prefessional content creation? Uh, OK, but that doesn't mean
that it makes sense to move to a Cell processor platform. Those users may
still feel more comfortable doing their content creation in a standard PC
environment if the support from Apple was there. Their sysadmins may want
it as well. Their companies which pay them may want it.
Huh? I don't understand. The Cell doesn't lack any features that prevent
it from hosting a "standard PC environment." It's not all vector
processing, you know -- it has a general-purpose core faster than most
CPUs currently on the market. It's more than capable of handling all the
day-to-day tasks of desktop computing -- which as I've pointed out
aren't all that taxing for modern hardware.
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english/NEWS_EN/20050525/105050/
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
IBM Corp. has revealed a prototype blade server board featuring the Cell
microprocessor jointly developed with the Sony Group and Toshiba Corp.
The company demonstrated the prototype in front of only a few clients at
a hotel room outside Los Angeles, US, at the 2005 Electronic
Entertainment Expo (E3), game tradeshow. "We demonstrated the prototype
to show that Cell continues to mature. The product is expected to have
several times higher performance compared to conventional servers," said
an IBM engineer.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
It sure looks like Cell is going to have applications outside of game
consoles.
remember when motorola used to supply all the gaming consoles with thier
CPUs? where did it get them.

Ps Screw IBM
Jeremy M. Middleton
2005-12-08 13:44:11 UTC
Permalink
I tihnk the reason apple is witching to the intel is

1. better more stable processor, the motorola chips are godd but the intel
are better

2. HEAT, anyone who own a powerbook can tel lyou sometimes those suckers can
get hot, they same with the new powermac, the reason they need liquid
cooling is casue the chips run so hot

3. because of the heat problem makes me wondier why there has not been a
powerbook g5 yet?

4. Apple will never get out of the hardware business, nothing in the retail
market can touch an imac g5 with isight bulit in for fuctionality and
affordabilty
Post by ZnU
Post by
Wall Street Journal http://online.wsj.com/public/us
Apple Explores Use Of Chips From Intel For Macintosh Line
By DON CLARK and NICK WINGFIELD
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
May 23, 2005; Page C1
Apple Computer Inc. has always blazed its own trail, a tack that has helped
turn the company into a stock-market darling lately. But a pivotal step
toward the mainstream could be in the offing.
The computer maker has been in talks that could lead to a decision soon to
use Intel Corp. chips in its Macintosh computer line, industry executives
say, a prospect that may shake up the world of computers and software.
Looking at what Intel and IBM have in the pipe, the idea that Apple
would switch to Intel processors for its computer line is blatantly
absurd. It might have made sense in the dark days of Motorola
stagnation; it makes no sense at all now. In case anyone hasn't noticed,
the movement these days is in the opposite direction -- Microsoft has
picked PPC for its new Xbox.
Moreover, it's unlikely Apple could make the switch even if they wanted
to. Emulating the PPC is notoriously difficult, and any new system which
couldn't run old software without a recompile would surely be a flop;
there would be no way to orchestrate a smooth transition, and lots of
apps would probably just never make it across at all.
Assuming Apple and Intel are actually in talks, there are a lot of
possibilities much more likely than Apple adopting Intel chips for the
Mac. Apple could be looking for a chip for a media appliance or wireless
device or some other embedded application, for instance. Maybe they want
to use Intel's XScale processors in a new video iPod or something.
(These processors are based on the ARM architecture, which Apple used in
some Newton models.)
[snip]
--
"This notion that the United States is getting ready to attack Iran is simply
ridiculous. And having said that, all options are on the table."
-- George W. Bush in Brussels, Belgium, Feb. 22, 2005
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...